oyopo
Design guides

Amsterdam · Mixed-use architecture

Valley, Amsterdam: where the city climbs into the building

Valley’s planted terraces create a strong skyline image. A closer architectural reading starts lower down: how do people move from Amsterdam’s streets into a building that combines homes, workspaces and other uses? The answer depends on boundaries as much as on greenery.

Reviewed 3 min read

A planted residential tower at Valley in Amsterdam, with projecting stone-faced terraces against blue sky.
Valley by MVRDV, Amsterdam, photographed in May 2023. The stepped residential edge contrasts with the larger volumes of the complex.JakobHosp · Wikimedia Commons · CC0 · Proportionally resized where needed and converted to WebP without enlargement; cards may be cropped. No generative changes.

Two faces make the change of setting visible

MVRDV describes a smooth glass exterior facing the surrounding business district and an inner landscape of stone surfaces, terraces and planting. The project combines residential, office and other programmes rather than assigning the whole complex to one use.

Source: MVRDV: Valley

This contrast gives the reader a useful starting point. An outer face can relate to the scale of the city block while an inward-facing edge responds to terraces and individual rooms. Neither face explains everything by itself; find a section that connects them.

Read Valley through boundaries
BoundaryLook for
Street to buildingEntrance and route into the complex
Shared landscape to homeThe point where residential privacy begins
Office to residential useSeparate access and service requirements
Planting to façadeThe relationship between soil, enclosure and maintenance

Follow a route before counting the terraces

The architect identifies a publicly accessible valley between the towers, reached from outside by staircases. That route is a different type of space from a private apartment terrace, even where planting gives them a related appearance.

Source: MVRDV: Valley

Draw the route in one colour and the residential edges in another. At each meeting point, ask what makes the distinction clear: a change in level, an entrance, a screen or a boundary. Visible greenery cannot establish who may enter a particular terrace.

Stone-faced residential terraces and planting around a raised outdoor space at Valley in Amsterdam.
Valley, Amsterdam, photographed in May 2023. Stone terraces and planted edges make the transition between the building’s volumes visible.JakobHosp · Wikimedia Commons · CC0 · Proportionally resized where needed and converted to WebP without enlargement; cards may be cropped. No generative changes.

Different uses need different daily sequences

Mixed use becomes concrete at the entrance. An office worker arriving in the morning, a resident returning at night and a visitor following a landscape route do not necessarily need to pass through the same door.

The useful question is how these sequences coexist. Locate circulation and service spaces as well as the more photogenic terraces. A building can contain several uses without every area becoming shared; a clear distinction may be part of what makes the mixture workable.

A planted building has more than one date

MVRDV’s 2021 handover announcement explicitly described an establishment period for the landscape. Its later project page records full opening in September 2022. The two accounts describe different moments in the building’s development.

Source: MVRDV: Valley delivery

When comparing photographs, record both the image date and the project stage. A newly installed landscape and a later planted façade may look different without indicating that the architectural idea changed. Images can illustrate that development; they do not on their own establish ecological performance.

The useful comparison is urban, not just visual

Valley invites comparison with other mixed-use buildings through a simple question: how much of the experience belongs to the wider city, and how much belongs to an individual home?

Apply it to an entrance, a raised garden and a private balcony in turn. This moves the discussion beyond whether a façade looks green and towards the practical relationships that give its spaces different roles. It also prevents a public route from being mistaken for unrestricted access to the building.

Questions to take with you

  • Distinguish the outer face from the inward landscape.
  • Locate the point where a public route becomes private.
  • Read entrances for each use separately.
  • Attach a date and stage to landscape photographs.
How this guide was prepared

oyopo combines original architectural analysis with published information from architects and project teams. Sources identify the basis for project facts. The review date records the latest content check; design intentions and proposed facilities are distinguished from completed work. These articles are not site inspections or independent performance assessments.

Sources and further reading

MVRDV: ValleyPrimary account of the realised mixed-use project, its contrasting outer and inner faces and the publicly accessible landscape route described by the architect.

MVRDV: Valley deliveryDated 17 November 2021: handover and an intended period for planting to establish, before a planned opening. Read against the later project account, not as the current stage.

Follow another idea